Українське історіописання голодомору в перебудовчий період

Гудзь, В. В. та Михайлов, В. В. (2021) Українське історіописання голодомору в перебудовчий період. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І. Вернадського. Серія: Історичні науки, 32 (3). с. 278-285. ISSN 2663-5984 (Print), 2663-5992 (Online)

Text (Українська історіографія Голодомору в роки перебудови. Зародження геноцидної парадигми Голодомору у вітчизняній історичній науці. С. Кульчицький) Гудзь,Михайлов. іф33. 21.pdf - Опублікована Версія Скачати (334kB)

Резюме

The change in the scientific paradigm of research on the topic was influenced by the process of «perestroika» and «publicity» in the Soviet Union and the results of the US Presidential Congressional Commission to study the famine of 1932–1933 in Ukraine. Ukrainian publicists and local historians (since 1987), and official historiography (since 1990), began to recognize the artificial nature of the Holodomor. During the period of perestroika, the transition of the leading expert on the history of the Ukrainian SSR of the interwar period S. Kulchytsky from denial to the recognition of artificial famine and further to the understanding of its genocidal nature was completed. It was S. Kulchytsky was the first who developed the paradigmatic concept of J. Mace-R. Lemkin about the Holodomor as genocide of the Ukrainian people. The demarcation of S. Kulchytsky’s famine of 1932 in the USSR and the Holodomor of 1933 in the USSR and in the Kuban, as fundamentally different phenomena a new methodological approach in world historiography was. The first had a functional and the second an intentional character. During the perestroika period, a wide public discourse of scientists, publicists, and politicians was formed in Ukraine, the traditions of which have still prolonging. The dominant concept of the famine of 1932/33 as genocide of the Ukrainian people is contrasted with the «right» ethnocide version of the planned extermination of Ukrainians by Moscow or the «left» interpretation to justify the Kremlin’s actions by objective circumstances, failure of crops and sabotage of the Ukrainian peasantry. Another, liberal version deny uniqueness of the famine in Ukraine and the terms «Holodomor» and «genocide» as alleged ideological constructs, which is combine with modernization and revisionist theories abroad. Among the shortcomings of the scientific investigation of the topic in the late 1980s, the lack of factual content, due to the lack of open archival materials, and the ideological nature of the official interpretation of the events of 1932/33 in the USSR were noted. Many scholars mixed the categories and describe the nature of the famine in Ukraine in 1933, ranging from «typical famine due failure of crop and negligence» to «genocide of the Ukrainian people», and transferred the term «Holodomor» to all mass hunger strikes in Ukraine in the 1920s and 1940s.

Тип елементу :	Стаття
Теми:	C Супутні історичні науки > C Супутні історичні науки (Загальне)
Підрозділи:	Природничо-географічний факультет > Кафедра історії та археології
Користувач, що депонує:	Кафедра історії
Дата внесення:	24 Лист 2021 17:36
Останні зміни:	24 Лист 2021 17:36
URI:	http://eprints.mdpu.org.ua/id/eprint/12303

Виконати (потребує авторізації)

Перегляд елементу